|
Post by Boudewijn on Jul 8, 2004 19:18:18 GMT 1
|
|
|
Post by Thurston_Whore on Jul 8, 2004 20:46:57 GMT 1
LOL..thats lame
|
|
|
Post by lifes a bummer on Jul 8, 2004 22:32:33 GMT 1
Ya that sucks
|
|
|
Post by h8kurdt on Jul 9, 2004 16:50:17 GMT 1
Shit. I'm pearl jam
|
|
|
Post by Boudewijn on Jul 23, 2004 20:03:31 GMT 1
Ya,
it is quite sucking that you can't be Mudhoney......
|
|
|
Post by Mudhoney1988 on Jul 27, 2004 11:17:07 GMT 1
I'm f***ing alice in chains!!!!!!! i hate them!!! i wanna be mudhoney!!!!!!!!!!! let me be mudhoney!!!!!!!! or TAD ;D BIG FAT TAD
|
|
|
Post by h8kurdt on Jul 28, 2004 17:13:00 GMT 1
Hey whats wrong woh A.I.C? Better than Pearl jam anyway.
|
|
|
Post by thorn on Jul 29, 2004 14:47:07 GMT 1
no no no alice in chains suck they were manufactured by the warner label, plus the only thing laine staley sings about is heroin, how cliched. and they sound like metallica, haha i can see some people gettinh pissed about this!!
|
|
|
Post by h8kurdt on Jul 29, 2004 17:25:26 GMT 1
Please dont get me started. He didn't sing about heroin alllllllll the time...... just the majority. They dont sound that much like Metallica but the metal influence is definetly there (just like all 'grunge' bands). But really to say they're 'grunge' is kinda wrong. They just appered when 'grunge' was at its peek and they got forced into the wave of other 'grunge' bands. Still a kick ass band never the less.
|
|
|
Post by Boudewijn on Jul 31, 2004 12:30:58 GMT 1
no no no alice in chains suck they were manufactured by the warner label, plus the only thing laine staley sings about is heroin, how cliched. and they sound like metallica, haha i can see some people gettinh pissed about this!! There is definately nothing wrong with Alice in Chains. Just except someone's taste dude
|
|